Lisle Watchdog

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Meet "Mr. Smith"



Mr. Smith" is an 81 yr old Lisle resident and taxpayer. He has lived here a long time. He knows a lot of people in town, so, he asked that his "real name" not be used in this story.




"Mr. Smith" is one of the senior citizens in Lisle who has seen a 28% increase in his property tax bill in the past 3 years. 

"Mr. Smith" qualified for, and received, a senior freeze exemption, a senior homestead exemption, and a homeowner's exemption on his property tax bill. 

"Mr. Smith," like many seniors, lives on a fixed income. In order to qualify for a senior freeze, he submits an affidavit every year that his household income is below the threshold. He derives his income mostly from social security and some interest on savings and investments. He does not collect a pension. 

"Mr. Smith" says that his social security payment went up less than 2% this past year for cost of living increase, (up about $500/yr) but the cost of his Medicare supplement insurance went up, as did the cost of water, the cost of gasoline, food and his property tax bill. His income from interest has dropped, too, over recent years since interest rates fell.   

"Mr. Smith" has cut back on other expenditures and if the housing market were better, he says he would consider selling his home.  

In 2010, "Mr. Smith" paid his 2009 property tax bill of $4,245. 
This year, he paid $5,425 in property taxes - 27.8% more.

Just this past year, "Mr. Smith" has seen a 9.1% increase in his property tax bill - from $4,975 to $5,425.  Property taxes alone more than ate up the small annual increase in his social security payment. He had been using his savings to pay for everyday costs that have increased. He worries about having enough money to live in his home for another 10-15 years.

Below you will find a summary of "Mr. Smith's" property tax increases from 2009 to 2012. 

Just reminder, the property tax is billed and due the year after the assessed year - the 2012 property tax was due in 2013. 


Tax Year 2012
$ 307,000 Fair Cash Value
$ 102,330 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   21,750 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     7.6868 Tax Rate
$   5,425 Tax Due    


Tax Year 2011

$ 326,400 Fair Cash Value
$ 108,800 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   28,220 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     7.0482 Tax Rate
$   4,975 Tax Due   


Tax Year 2010

$ 348,120 Fair Cash Value
$ 116,040 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   35,460 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     6.5662 Tax Rate
$   4,634  Tax Due  


Tax Year 2009

$ 366,410 Fair Cash Value
$ 122,140 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   41,560 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     6.0138 Tax Rate
$   4,245  Tax Due  


When asked if he has contacted any local elected officials with his concerns about property taxes, "Mr. Smith" sighed and said that over the years he has come to learn that they simply don't care, don't listen and don't act. He said that he was very disturbed when an elected board laughed and belittled a long-time friend who expressed his concerns at a meeting about another issue a few years ago. 

"Society doesn't respect seniors these days, at least not in the way I was taught as a kid."  - Mr. Smith.  


Tax Rates:
  • 2012   7.6868
  • 2011   7.0482
  • 2010   6.5662
  • 2009   6.0138

Property assessments for 2013 will be lowered 3.75% across the board in Lisle Township. But since "Mr. Smith" is on senior freeze, he will see another hefty increase in property taxes unless all the taxing bodies reduce their tax levies to maintain a flat tax rate. 

(Note: Slight adjustments were made to the numbers to protect "Mr. Smith's" identity and privacy at his request. The information was obtained and verified by the DuPage County Treasurer's Office website tax database. LINK HERE
 - originally posted October 1, 2013 on Lisle Patch

Monday, November 11, 2013

How to "Do Atlantic City" on Lisle's Taxpayers Backs



How would you like a one week trip, including airfare, meals and hotel expenses at the Trump Taj Mahal Casino paid for by Lisle taxpayers?





There is only one catch… You first have to run for Village Clerk.

Yup, Lisle's elected Village Clerk, Tim Seeden, was the lucky winner of this year's all expenses paid, one week trip to Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Just 4 weeks after the record setting April 18 flood in Lisle, Tim Seeden took off for a one week conference  for the International Institute of Municipal Clerks held in Atlantic City. The conference was held May 19 -23, 2013. The event kicked off on Sunday night at 7 pm May 19, 2013 with a reception with costumed entertainers, the Philadelphia Mummers.

Session topics included: 


Wednesday Evening's bash was a Beach Party featuring a tribute to Bruce Springsteen.

The International Institute of Municipal Clerks touts membership of 10,000 clerks from the US, Canada, and other countries. In the U.S. alone there are over 80,000 units of local government. In 2012, the IIMC sent out a letter to its membership citing concerns with falling attendance at it annual meeting and conference and pledged to make the conference more affordable in following years.

Not many municipalities pay to send their clerk to the International conference. Since 2009, many of those municipalities that previously paid to send a clerk to the international conference have been cutting this expensive conference from their budgets due to economic conditions …. But not Lisle.

Here is what Tim Seeden's one week trip to Atlantic City cost Lisle taxpayers.

  • Airfare  May 18 - 24                      $   233.78
  • Conference Fees May 19 - 23               $   575.00
  • Trump Taj Mahal Casino & Hotel May 18-24  $   861.50
  • Meals & Transportation                    $   237.59
  • TOTAL                                     $ 1,907.87


Tim Seeden has been the elected Clerk of the Village of Lisle for 14 yrs and was first elected in 1999.

Stay tuned... More to come on the taxpayers cost of Seeden's other overnight trips taken this past year for conventions and meetings. 

We need a tax increase? Really? 

Friday, November 8, 2013

Ollie, Ollie, Oxen Free !!! Lisle Park District's 2014 Proposed Budget is Out of Hiding




Last week, the Lisle Park District Board of Commissioner's meeting agenda included a discussion of the proposed draft budget for FY 2014. However, despite a new transparency effort to post board packets online before commission meetings, the draft 2014 budget was not posted on the District's website. And it still isn't.

Lisle Watchdog submitted a FOIA last week to obtain a copy of the 2014 draft budget.


Ollie, Ollie, Oken Free!
Click the link to download the entire 2014 draft budget.  
http://bit.ly/1emy9mx

Notably, there is no overall "executive summary" of proposed budget revenue and expenditures, so one has to take the time to go through the budget fund-by-fund, section-by-section, line-by-line, all 145 pages, and compare previous year's actual revenues and expenditures to the proposed revenues and expenditures for next year.


Here are some of the budget highlights....

Corporate Fund:  (primary revenue source is property tax) pg 17


                                         Revenue         Expenditures    Surplus (Deficit)  
  2011 Actual                      2,068,938         2,103,192           (   34,254)
  2012 Actual                      2,145,937         2,299,826           ( 153,889)
  2013 Projected Actual        2,122,408         2,356,290           ( 233,882) 
  2014 Proposed Budget        2,888,300(*)      2,555,362(**)        332,938

      (*) 36% higher than 2013 projected actual revenues
    (**) 8.5% higher than 2013 projected actual expenditures


Recreation Fund: (revenue sources are program fees subsidized w/ property taxes) pg 114

                                         Revenue           Expenditures    Surplus (Deficit)  
  2011 Actual                       2,348,570          2,338,117            10,453
  2012 Actual                       2,478,709          2,240,313           238,396
  2013 Projected Actual         2,425,820          2,035,242           390,578 
  2014 Proposed Budget         2,009,062(*)       2,260,478(**)      (251,416)
   
      (*) 17% lower than 2013 projected actual revenues
    (**) 11% higher than 2013 projected actual expenditures


Golf & Restaurant Fund: (revenue sources are program fees) pg 144

                                         Revenue            Expenditures     Surplus (Deficit)  
  2011 Actual                       1,999,996           1,824,464           175,532
  2012 Actual                       1,843,754           1,698,501           145,253
  2013 Projected Actual         1,872,921           1,944,546           (  71,625) 
  2014 Proposed Budget         1,877,917(*)        1,927,195(**)      (  49,278)
   
      (*) 0.2% higher than 2013 projected actual revenues
    (**) 0.9% lower than 2013 projected actual expenditures


IMRF Pension Fund: (revenue source is property taxes) pg 123

                                       Revenue              Expenditures      Surplus (Deficit)  
  2011 Actual                        235,152               272,392            ( 37,240)
  2012 Actual                        249,766               252,628            (   2,862)
  2013 Projected Actual          339,921               260,000               79,921 
  2014 Proposed Budget          375,050(*)            275,000 (**)        100,050
   
      (*) 10% lower than 2013 projected actual revenues
    (**) 5.8% higher than 2013 projected actual expenditures


Trips & Conventions for Elected Officials

One line that really caught our attention was the proposed huge increase for expenditures in the budget for the Board of Commissioners (elected officials), primarily allocated for conference expenses. 

    Board of Commissioners Expenses (page 8)

     2011 Actual                        1,086
     2012 Actual                           733                      
     2013 Projected Actual          2,509
     2014 Proposed Budget        11,500

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Lisle's 2012 Property Tax Rates Higher than Neighbor Towns

A very popular blog from Lisle Watchdog written 3 months ago...


August 13,2013 - The 2012 property tax rates imposed on home owners and businesses and other property owners within the Village of Lisle for municipal, park, fire and library services are significantly higher than the property tax rates imposed by neighboring towns Wheaton, Naperville, Glen Ellyn and Downers Grove for the same services. 

A Lisle property owner pays 86% more for these services in property tax than a Naperville property owner on equal-valued property.  

A Lisle property owner pays 82% more for these services in property tax than a Downers Grove property owner on equal-valued property
.  

Questions

1. Are higher property tax rates to blame for the disproportionately higher decline in home values in Lisle? 

2. Do Lisle residents and businesses get more for their money than Naperville, Wheaton, Glen Ellyn and Downers Grove residents?

3. Are higher property tax rates a disincentive for investment by prospective business owners? 


Summary of 2012 Property Tax Rates in DuPage (*)
  • 2.1512   Village of Lisle
  • 1.7437   City of Wheaton
  • 1.2706   Village of Glen Ellyn
  • 1.1365   Village of Downers Grove
  • 1.0904   City of Naperville 
 (*)  Source: DuPage County Treasurer & DuPage County Clerk.

Additional Comparisons of 2012 Property Tax Rates (**)

  • 2.202  Hoffman Estates
  • 2.151  Village of Lisle
  • 1.908  Des Palines
  • 1.724  Evanston
  • 1.708  Skokie
  • 1.695  Willmette
  • 1.481  Park Ridge
  • 1.408  Glenview
(**) Summation of property tax rates for municipal, fire, park district, library. Excludes schools, township and county property taxes. 

Breakdown of Lisle Property 2012 Tax Rates:
  • 0.4682 Village of Lisle
  • 0.4035 Lisle Library District
  • 0.7920 Lisle Woodridge Fire District
  • 0.4875 Lisle Park District
  • 2.1512 TOTAL

Breakdown of Naperville Property 2012 Tax Rates:
  • 0.5382  City of Naperville (includes fire)
  • 0.2374  Naperville Library
  • 0.3148  Naperville Park District
  • 1.0904 TOTAL

Breakdown of Glen Ellyn Property 2012 Tax Rates:

  • 0.5213 Village of Glen Ellyn (includes fire)
  • 0.3276 Glen Ellyn Library 
  • 0.4114 Glen Ellyn Park District
  • 0.0103 Glen Ellyn Mosquito Dist
  • 1.2706  TOTAL

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Lisle Park District Plays "Hide & Seek" with 2014 Draft Budget




On October 29, 2013 the Lisle Park District Board of Commissioners held a special meeting to discuss the Draft 2014 Budget.

The 2014 Draft Budget was not made readily available to the public before the meeting. The 2014 budget was not posted in a board packet on the district website, it was not posted under "financial" documents on the district website and the executive director ignored a request for a copy of the draft budget just hours before the start of the Oct 29, 2013 budget meeting. 

The next regular meeting of the Lisle Park Board is scheduled for November 14, 2013. It is expected that the 2014 Budget will be approved at the November Board Meeting as it has been in years past. 

In December, the Board will consider approval of the 2013 Property Tax Levy Ordinance. 

Historically, the Park District Board meeting agendas and meeting minutes do not document the amount of the tax levy. The 2013 Tax Levy Ordinance will be filed with the County Clerk by Dec 24, 2013.

Despite falling property values, the Lisle Park District seeks the maximum possible property tax increase under the law called PTELL, commonly called the "tax cap," every single year.  Reports on the 2013 losses for golf and restaurant operations is due soon.


Historical Property Tax Data: 

  Year   Property Tax Levy     Property Tax Rate

  2013         ??             
  2012     $ 5,504,719 **         0.4875
  2011     $ 5,391,089            0.4455
  2010     $ 5,216,446            0.4234
  2009     $ 5,058,871            0.3858
  2008     $ 4,816,123            0.3678
  2007     $ 4,719,825            0.3674
  2006     $ 4,428,677            0.3773
  2005     $ 4,217,776            0.3978
  2004     $ 3,790,333            0.3895
  2003     $ 3,731,326            0.3979
  2002     $ 3,861,863            0.3773

    ** The 2012 Property Tax levy was 43% higher than the 2002 levy.


Historical Employer Contributions to IMRF Pension Plan

  Year    Employer Contribution
      
  2013           ?   
  2012           ?
  2011       $ 321,957 (72% higher than 2007)
  2010       $ 236,957
  2009       $ 201,258
  2008       $ 195,234
  2007       $ 187,401





.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Lisle Library Plans Citizen "Hit List"


The Lisle Library's newly-formed "Information Stewardship Committee" wasted no time in taking the first steps toward improving ways to inform the public - starting with a new citizen "Hit List." 

Recently, a former Trustee in Sauk Village accused the Village of Sauk Village of posting a FOIA list, a "Hit List," as he called it, as a method of targeting and intimidating citizens who submit FOIA requests.   Modeled after ... You guessed it... The Village of Lisle. Maybe we should change the tag line from Arboretum Village to  __________??? 




Back to the story...

On September 11, 2013, the Lisle Library Information Stewardship Committee diverted from their stated purpose of "record retention, publication and storage" and moved swiftly into discussion and planning to post a citizen "hit list" online with the of the names of persons who ask for copies of public records under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.



A few things to keep in mind as you read through the following excerpt from the Sept 11, 2013 committee meeting: 

  • The FOIA Officer for the Lisle Library did not complete any state-mandated annual FOIA training during FY 2012-2013, per records from the IL Attorney General.  The FOIA Officer for the Lisle Library is Shannon Halikias.
  • The Illinois Attorney General is currently reviewing numerous alleged Open Meetings violations of the Lisle Library Board dating back to meetings held in May 2013. HereHereHere
  • The Library's "working budget" is adopted and approved without a public hearing. Draft "working budgets" in board packets are not made readily available to inform the public prior to approval. 
  • The Lisle library does not post board packets online before board meetings and will not provide a paper copy or electronic copy of the board packet to a citizen before a board meeting.Here.
  • The Lisle Library may have destroyed public records related to a staff party at Mullen's Bar & Grill. Here.
  • The Lisle Library has the highest property tax rate of all neighboring community libraries. Here.
  • The IL Freedom of Information Act allows public bodies to a deny request for copies of public records if the request is burdensome. Here.
  • The Lisle Library does not post online a "checkbook" of expenditures.
  • The Lisle Library does not post online the full roster of employee salaries, benefits and pension costs. 
  • The Lisle Library does not post online contracts, bid notices, RFPs.
  • The Lisle Library does not post online a 5 year financial forecast.

Excerpt from Committee Meeting Minutes:  
"Library Director,  Shannon Halikias [FOIA Officer], brought up the issue of requests for copies of public records under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act. (FOIA). 
We are getting a new copier with scanning capabilities. This should help us scan documents needed for FOIA’s.  Richard Flint stated that the committee members need to take a look at FOIA’s and possibly retake FOIA training. 
"We need to post our FOIA’s on our website so that our patrons can see these are becoming burdensome.
"Shannon Halikias stated she is happy to sit down, one on one with patrons to explain things. She believes citizen input is a good thing.  
"Jen Ohzourk stated she has dealt with FOIA requests at her previous job and many people are just looking to find something wrong, Technology would help with this.  
"We need to publish the names of people who request FOIA’s and how much time it took to fulfill the request.  
"Tom Hummel stated a flow chart on the web site would be a good thing.  He would like to see a voucher list on the website before meetings and he thinks it is a good thing we have ordered a new copier/scanner to scan in our monthly bills.  
"Lindsey Dorfman stated putting a list of FOIA‘s and time spent on them would give the public insight as to how their taxpayer dollars are working for them. 
"Shannon Halikias [FOIA Officer] stated we are researching FOIA’s and the way they need to be responded to. 
"With recent FOIA requests, it is important to realize that we respond with existing documents.  We do not create new documents in response to a FOIA.  
"Richard Flint stated that the president of the board needs to know each time a FOIA is requested.  
Katherine Seelig, Shannon Halikias and Richard Flint will create an agenda for FOIA’s for the committee to discuss."  
   
   * * * * * * * 

Next meeting of the Information Stewardship Committee will be held on Nov 20, 2013 at 6:30 pm. 

QUESTIONS: 
Will the Lisle Library be posting the responses to each FOIA request, too?
Will the next meeting of the Information Stewardship Committee address "records retention, publication, and storage" of public records?

It's Vegas, Baby!! Broda in the 1% of Mayors Bilking Taxpayers for Trip to "Sin City"


The most popular Lisle Watchdog blog on Lisle Patch...




July 15,2013 - Lisle Mayor Joe Broda joined 10 mayors from Illinois at the annual U.S. Mayors Conference held at the Mandolay Bay Casino & Hotel in Las Vegas June 21-24, 2013. 

Lisle taxpayers paid $3,140.00 for Broda's recent Las Vegas trip (to date - see below for detail)


Lisle Mayor Joe Broda is NOT a voting member of the U.S. Conference of Mayors. The USCM membership fee for municipalities with a population under 30,000 is $1,992 per year.

There  are 1299 cities, villages and towns in the State of Illinois - each with a mayor.

Only 11 mayors in Illinois used taxpayer funds to pay airfare, conference fees, transportation and expenses for the 4 day Las Vegas conference. That comes to less than 1% ( 0.85% to be exact ) of Illinois mayors taking taxpayers' money to pay for a trip to Vegas.

Lisle Mayor Joe Broda is the 1%

Only 180 municipalities throughout the entire 50 states chose to send their mayor to this year's conference in Las Vegas according to the USCM registration website. Over 1000 mayors were expected to register. Many municipalities cut the trip due to necessary belt-tightening as employee health care benefits and pensions costs increased at the same time aging infrastructure replacement, maintenance and improvement costs strained budgets. Other municipalities simply did not see the trip as a necessary public expenditure and could not justify the benefit to their town was worth the cost of the trip.

Only 5 non-member municipalities in the entire country chose to use taxpayer  money to fund a trip for their mayor to Las Vegas - a trip where they have no voting rights on any official business. Lisle is one of those 5 municipalities in the entire country that chose to spend taxpayer's money to send a non-voting mayor to Las Vegas. (see USCM registration website)

Mayors from the following Illinois municipalities attended the USCM conference in Las Vegas this year:

Lisle (*), AddisonBloomingtonHanover ParkDanvilleHoffman Estates, Loves Park (*), Lake BarringtonNorth Chicago,  Waukegan and O'Fallon (*).

(*) - not an official voting member of USCM. 

What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas

So, what happens at the annual US Mayor's Conference?
Here is a link to the agenda: AGENDA.

During the convention, over 240 pages of resolutions were adopted by official voting members.

Lisle Mayor Joe Broda is NOT a voting member of the U.S. Conference of Mayors according to the USCM website.

Chicago Mayor Rahn Emanuel sponsored the resolution for background checks for firearms purchases, but did not attend the USCM Las Vegas conference.

The voting members also urged the federal government to give states leeway in establishing marijuana policies and urged Congress to adopt comprehensive immigration reform. Broda could not vote on any resolution, since he is not an official voting member.

U.S. Mayors Convention Notice: "Unless otherwise noted, all plenary sessions, committee meetings, task force meetings, workshops and social events are open to all mayors and other officially-registered attendees. However, only member mayors of a standing committee are eligible to vote on resolutions before that standing committee."

Several of the mayors that attended gave speeches and/or lead committee meetings and task force groups, including mayors from:

Columbus, Little Rock, Laredo, Bridgeport, Piscataway, Boston, Baltimore, Las Vegas, Louisville, Indianapolis, Denton, Irving, Auburn, Sumter, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Houston, Des Moines, Atlanta, Hollingdale Beach, Southfield, Oklahoma City, Minneapolis, Long Beach, Dallas, Waterbury, Beaverton, Lansing, Austin, Newton, Pembroke Pines, Santa Ana, Salt Lake City, San Jose, Jacksonville, Portland, Sacramento, Mesa, Oakland, Belmar, New Orleans, Fresno, Carmel, Avondale, Tacoma, San Francisco, Birmingham, Wichita, Allentown, San Bruna, Kansas City, Burnsville, St. Louis, Tallahassee, Miramar, Phoenix, East Orange, Cincinnati, Elizabeth, Madison, Santa Barbara, Debuque.

Keynote speeches were given by Vice President Joe Biden andRichard M. Daley, former mayor of Chicago.


Social Activities: When not busy with official duties voting on resolutions, all who paid the registration fee, including non-USCM members and those not allowed to vote on official USCM business, were invited to many social events, at no additional fee.

Friday evening: Surfside Party at Mandalay Bay Beach - "tasty treats, speciality drinks ... and entertainment."

Saturday evening: A Taste of Downtown at the Fremont Street Experience. "Viva Las Vegas! Experience vintage Vegas at the place where the glitz and glamour began, Fremont Street in downtown Las Vegas." Food, drinks and entertainment included.

Sunday: Cirque Du Soleil And Michael Jackson – Michael Jackson ONE” followed by a late night party at the "House of Bluesfor a celebration honoring the outgoing USCM president and welcoming the incoming USCM president.

No Vegas Trip for You

The following DuPage municipalities did NOT send their mayor to this years convention:

Naperville, Aurora, Downers Grove, Elmhurst, Wheaton, Glen Ellyn, Woodridge, Bolingbrook, Westmont, Clarendon Hills, Hinsdale, Darien, Burr Ridge, Willowbrook, Oak Brook, Villa Park , Itasca, Glendale Heights, Lombard, Winfield, West Chicago, Warrenvville, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Bensenville, Wayne, Lemont, Bartlett, Roselle, Oak Brook Terrace, Medinah, Wood Dale, and St. Charles.

Mayors from some of the largest cities in Illinois did NOT attend - this includes mayors from:

Chicago, Springfield, Rockford, Peoria, Arlington Heights, Aurora, Joliet, Elgin, Cicero, Naperville, Champaign, Evanston, Decatur, Paletine, Skokie and Des Plaines.

Broda's Detailed Las Vegas Expenditures
(source village board packets)

$   892.52              Mandalay Bay Casino & Hotel US Mayor Conf
$     29.94              Mandalay Bay Casino & Hotel US Mayor Conf
$   141.00              A1 Airport Limo US Mayor Conf
$1,400.00              US Mayor Conf Registration
$   222.88              Hotel Deposit
$   452.80              Airfare US Mayors Conf

About U. S. Conference of Mayors
The U.S. Conference of Mayors is the official non-partisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. Mayors contribute to the development of national policy by serving on one or more of the conference’s standing committees which recommend policy positions every year at the Annual Meeting they believe should be adopted by the organization. The policy positions that are adopted are then distributed to the President and Congress.

Related Media Links