Property Tax Burden Shifts to Residential Owners in Lisle

The property tax burden in the Village of Lisle has shifted significantly since 2001 when Joe Broda was first elected Mayor.

Back in 2001, residential property owners carried 51% of the total property tax burden and commercial and industrial property owners carried 49% of the tax burden. 

In 2013, residential property owners carried 62% of the total property tax burden in the Village while commercial and industrial property owners only carried 38% of the tax burden. 

This overall 22% shift in the property tax burden to residential property owners is due to both a reduction in the total assessed valuation for commercial and industrial property and an increase in the total assessed valuation of residential property in the Village.

Sadly, under Mayor Broda (now in his 4th term of office), the Village of Lisle has been focused development of new residential. The commercial and industrial tax base has eroded leaving the residents to pick up the slack and pay more and more tax. 

• 2001 Commercial + Industrial EAV  = $ 373.5 Million
• 2013 Commercial + Industrial EAV  = $ 350.0 Million  (6% reduction)

• 2001 Residential EAV = $ 392.7 Million 
• 2013 Residential EAV = $ 566.0 Million (44% increase)

(click image to enlarge)

Lisle's 1st TIF District Continues to Decline in Value

In December 2010, the Village of Lisle Board of Trustees approved the single-parcel 2600 Warrenville TIF District and a Redevelopment Plan for Navistar's renovation of the 88-acre multi-building 1.2 million square feet office campus formerly owned by Alcatel Lucent.

The property purchase price in 2010 was $33 Million.

The most recent assessed value has not come close to the $188.5 Million that Mayor Broda presented at his State of the Village address in 2013.

The TIF Redevelopment Plan identified a $130 Million investment.
        $110 Million in private investment
          $20 Million in publicly funded investment from the TIF.

The 2014 Fair Market Value, per the County Assessor is $115 Million; $15 Million less than the reported total investment. (Ref: 2012 TIF Report filed with the IL Comptroller)


History of the declining taxable value:

The project area has only seen a $2 Million increase in EAV as a result of a $20 Million TIF Redevelopment Agreement. (EAV is 1/3 of the fair market value)

The TIF has failed to spur development in the surrounding area and surrounding property values have fallen significantly since the completion of the redevelopment - most notably the decline in assessed value of the nearby hotels and office buildings.
(click image to enlarge)

Ref: PIN 08-04-100-022

                                                           Ref: PIN 08-04-101-015 

Ref: PIN 08-04-101-012

DuPage County Property Lookup:  https://www.dupageco.org/PropertyInfo/PropertyLookUp.aspx

Lisle: Employee Total Compensation Not Disclosed.

Not Complying with State Law

Under Illinois Law, governmental bodies are required to post online the "Total Compensation" of employees with a "total compensation package" exceeding $75,000/year. In addition, the law requires that for total compensation packages equal to or in excess of $150,000, the employer must post the total compensation package for those employees within 6 days before that employee’s total compensation package is approved by the employer. The law was designed to detect "pension spiking."

The Village of Lisle posts a "compensation report," but fails to post "total" compensation as per State Law. The Village fails to report: vehicle allowance, additional deferred compensation, and health insurance.

Let's take a look at the FY 2014-2015 "Total Compensation" vs. the "compensation" reported and posted for Village Manager Jerry Sprecher.

Here is what the Village of Lisle Reports as his 2014-2015 Compensation: Budgeted Salary $157,502.
(click to enlarge) 

Here is the actual 2014-2015 "Total Compensation Package" that should be reported:

$ 157,502       Salary
       3,150       2% Deferred Compensation Paid by Employer, per contract.
       2,908       Car for business and personal use. (1)                    
     18,666       Employer Paid Health Insurance
          162       Employer Paid Vision Insurance
       1,083       Employer Paid Dental Insurance
     21,570       Employer Paid IMRF Contributions (2)
$ 205,041       Total Compensation Package.


In addition, Sprecher gets nearly 9 weeks of paid time off - ANNUALLY!!!
Unused time is accrued and paid out.... eventually.
Pension-padders like to accrue this time for end of career pension spikes.

208 hours     Vacation
104 hours     Sick Leave
  40 hours     Incidental Illness
  64 hours     8 paid holidays
416 hours     52 days Paid Time Off (paid out if not used)


Link to an example of properly reported "Total Compensation":  LINK 

Lisle Village Manager Jerry Sprecher at the 2014 Lisle Chamber Dinner-Dance Gala

Tickets paid for by Lisle Taxpayers. (facebook, fair use) 

Supporting Documents 

1. Vehicle Use. 

Report shows an average of 80 miles per week for business use. 
Exactly 50% for personal use/50% for business use. 
Exactly 50%. Really? 

No logs were provided in FOIA response. 

2. IMRF Contributions. Employer contributions. The Village of Lisle contributes $21,570 per year to Sprecher's pension. Note that the 2014-15 wages do not match the State mandated disclosure that was posted online (see above). There is a discrepancy of nearly $6,000. 

Lisle Zoning Committee Fizzles Out

The Lisle Subdivision and Zoning Code Task Force was established in 2011 and held meetings for about 2 years and then  - *POOF*  - they were gone.

The Task Force appears to have disappeared before completing their assigned task of reviewing and making recommendations for revisions to the Village's Zoning and Subdivision Codes. There have been no meetings for the past 2 years. The Task Force did not even approve the minutes of their last meeting.

Records of the Committee were provided by the Village on Apirl 14, 2015 in response to a FOIA submitted on April 2.  About 500 pages of records were provided one day before a scheduled Public Hearing on a complete re-write of Title 5 Ch 14 Planned Unit Development section of the Village Zoning Code.  A notice for the code change public hearing was placed in the classified section of the Daily Herald 15 days in advance during Spring Break week. The public was caught off-guard.

These "Task Force" records were previously available on the Village website and were removed in Nov 2014.

• 2011 Records
• 2012 Records
• 2013 Records 

The Subdivision and Zoning Task Force was scheduled to hold a "Community Workshop" to inform the public before bringing any changes to the Planning & Zoning Commission.

It never happened.

Nine Task Force Members were appointed by the Village Board:

• Steve Bauer
• Pat Caweizel
• Carl Fiedler
• Jim Kozoil
• Charlie Rego (PZC Chairman)
• Bret Richter
• Tony Buzikowski (Staff)
• Josh Potter (Staff)
• John Wonais (Staff Intern) 

Post in progress. More to come...

Village of Lisle Violates State Law

Village of Lisle is in violation of State of Illinois Municipal Code ...

and has been in violation for years.

The Illinois Complied Statutes (also commonly referred to as the Laws of the State of IL) has an entire section devoted to IL Municipal Code - a section of State Law that outlines the authority, responsibility and duties of local government.

Illinois Municipal Code changes in 2002 (13 years ago):

(65 ILCS 5/1-2-3.1) 

    Sec. 1-2-3.1. Building codes. Beginning on the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 92nd General Assembly, any municipality with a population of less than 1,000,000 adopting a new building code or amending an existing building code must, at least 30 days before adopting the code or amendment, provide an identification of the code, by title and edition, or the amendment to the Illinois Building Commission for identification on the Internet. 

    For the purposes of this Section, "building code" means any ordinance, resolution, law, housing or building code, or zoning ordinance that establishes construction related activities applicable to structures in the municipality. 

(Source: P.A. 92-489, eff. 7-1-02.)

Not once since 2002 has the Village of Lisle complied with this law. 

Not once in the past 13 years has the Village of Lisle complied with this State Law. 

Lisle Watchdog spoke with the Illinois Building Commission on March 30, 2015 to verify the violation and failure to report building code adoptions and amendments. The State records show no reporting since the Village of Lisle adoption of the building code "BOCA 1996." BOCA ceased to exist in 2000 and was replaced by the International Building Code (IBC). The IBC Building Code was first issued in 1997 and has be updated and re-issued in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. Most municipalities in Illinois have adopted the 2012 or 2009 versions of the building code. 

The Village of Lisle Code states that the current building code enforced in Lisle is IBC 2003. The Village did not provide notification to the Illinois Building Commission 30 days prior to adopting that code back in 2007 (Ordinance 2007-4161). In fact, the Village still has not notified the IL Building Commission eight years later. 

The Village of Lisle Code also states that the code has been updated to include all Ordinances passed through August 2014:  

       "This code was last updated by ordinance 2014-4543 passed August 13, 2014."

Now let's look at Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 8 of the Village of Lisle Code which states:  

4-1-8. Multiple Family Building Regulations: Each dwelling unit contained in a multiple-family residence building shall have a ceiling and floor and walls of a material with a minimum two (2) hour fire rating. All exterior walls of multiple-family residence buildings shall be of solid masonry construction except for "townhouse" and "row house" buildings as defined in this chapter. (Ord. 98-2977, 4-20-1998)

Back in April 2011, at the insistence of Opus Developers, the Village adopted Ordinance 2011-4381 to change the Village Code.  

The Village of Lisle did not provide a 30-day notice to the Illinois Building Commission. The Village of Lisle still has not notified the IL Building Commission of a 2011 building code change ordinance. The 2011 ordinance was not incorporated into Title 4, Chapter 1 of the Village of Lisle Building Code, which still states: 

4-1-8. Multiple Family Building Regulations: Each dwelling unit contained in a multiple-family residence building shall have a ceiling and floor and walls of a material with a minimum two (2) hour fire rating. All exterior walls of multiple-family residence buildings shall be of solid masonry construction except for "townhouse" and "row house" buildings as defined in this chapter. (Ord. 98-2977, 4-20-1998)

Ordinance 2011-4381 amended Title 5 of the Village Code, not Title 4:

 "Title 5 of the Village Code of the Village of Lisle is hereby amended...."

Title 5 is the Zoning Code and amendments to Title 5 require legal notice and a public hearing. 

The changes in Ordinance 2011-4381 do not appear in Title 5 of the Village Code as written the approved Ordinance. 

Changes were were made to Title 4, Chapter 5. 
There is, however, no record of Board approval of changes to Title 4, Chapter 5.  

The Village of Lisle has NEVER provided the State required 30-day notice to the IL Building Commission prior to the adoption of a Building Code, the amendment of the building code, nor adoption of an ordinance to modify the building code. 

The Village of Lisle has violated State Law since 2002.

LWFD Quietly Approves Major Reorganization Plan

Job Cuts Finally Hit the Fire Department. 

The Lisle-Woodridge Fire District Board of Trustees approved a major reorganization plan at their March 24, 2015 meeting that eliminates several jobs.

The reorganization plan was recently posted on the LWFD website and comes about 9 months after Moody's downgraded the District's financial rating due to underfunding its annual pension payments.

The reorganization plan calls for the elimination of company officer positions in order to free up sufficient funds to make required pension fund payments.

"In order to meet the fiscal demands... the rank of Captain shall be eliminated."

There are currently 5 officers holding the rank of "Captain" and those positions will be eliminated when the individuals who are currently holding the positions are "promoted, demoted, retire, resign, or otherwise terminated from service."

The reorganization Ordinance does not outline the cost savings from the elimination of positions. According to the posted compensation disclosure, (note: this is for 2013; current total compensation report has not been posted online) the position of "Captain" had a total compensation package of $144K - 155K per year. This could amount to a shift of about $750,000 per year from employee salaries/compensation to be used for pension funding. There were a total of 117 positions on the LWFD payroll in 2013 (not including paid trustees).

No long term financial plan has been publicly approved by the LWFD Board.


Background:

Alarm Sounds: Lisle Woodridge Fire District Fails to Respond

Link to Ordinance HERE.

Taxpayers Fight Back

960 DuPage Taxpayers File Tax Complaint Against 74 Local Governments

Lisle Park District, Lisle Library District, Lisle-Woodridge Fire District, Lisle Township, and Lisle School District 202

In November 2014, 960 taxpayers filed a 533-page property tax rate objection complaint in DuPage County Court seeking a refund of  millions in "illegal property taxes" levied by 74 local governmental entities, including Lisle Park District, Lisle Library District, Lisle-Woodridge Fire District, Lisle Township and Lisle School District 202.   

Click image to enlarge copy of the complaint:

The Lisle area taxpayers who filed the complaint include: 

• Commonwealth Edison
• Country Villas Apartments
• Courts of Williamsburg Apartments
• DuPage Medical Group
• Green Trails Apartments
• Hidden Creek Investments 
• Inland Group
• Jewel Companies
• JP Morgan Chase
• Dr. Paul & Mary Kay Ladone 
• Maple Terrace Management 
• Marathon Oil Company
• Public Storage
• Snow Valley Property LLC
• Stahelin Partners
• The Alter Group
• US Bank
• West Suburban Bank

Detailed tax objection against the Lisle Park District, HERE.

Detailed tax objection against the Lisle Library District, HERE.

Detailed complaint against the Lisle-Woodridge Fire District, HERE.

Detailed complaint against Lisle Township, HERE.

Detailed complaint against Lisle School District 202. HERE.