Lisle Watchdog

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Lisle Library's $900 Holiday Staff Party at Mullen's Bar & Grill Lacks Documentation



Lisle Library District taxpayers footed the bill for 50 people to attend a "holiday staff party" held on Saturday night, January 12, 2013, 7:30-10:30 pm at Mullen's Bar & Grill in Lisle

The $896.80 bill for the party was was placed on a Lisle Library District credit card assigned to Director Shannon Halikias. The expenditure was authorized by the credit card's user and the Lisle Library's Director, Shannon Halikias.  

The Lisle Library "holiday staff party" expense for the event at Mullen's Bar & Grill was recorded as "employee recognition." There are no records of the names of the employees who were invited to the event, no records of the names of the employees who attended the event, and no records of which employees were, in fact, "recognized." There are no records of the number of guests (non-employees) who attended the "staff party" at the public's expense. 

Documentation of the "party" event is lacking. 



Lisle Watchdog comes to this conclusion after submitting a FOIA to the Lisle Library on Oct 9, 2013 seeking ALL of the documentation, including correspondence and email, related to this taxpayer-funded Saturday night "holiday staff party" event.  The responses from the Lisle Library reveal not only a lack of documentation and accountability for the expenditure of public funds for a "holiday staff party," but raise important questions regarding poor records management systems and possible destruction of public records. Also a concern is the justification and priority of use of public funds on a "staff party" or on "employee recognition" (as if one could reasonably call a Saturday night party at a bar "employee recognition") in lieu of spending public funds on more important government functions  - such as the need for improvement of records management.

LW specifically requested a copy of the invitation to staff announcing the details of the event - date, time, place, costs, etc.  LW specifically requested copies of ALL email between and among staff regarding this event. LW expected to receive, at minimum, a blast email to the entire staff announcing the event details asking for RSVP's in order to make party reservations. 

Library's response on Oct 15, 2013 from Library Director Shannon Halikias: 

Library:   "Invitations - No invitations printed, no documents responsive to this request.    A sign was posted in our staff room, and that is not something we would retain as a record."

LW wondered ... No invitation? No documents? No blast email with event details? No RSVP's? Who attended? The sign was destroyed? 

Library"The record of the location is on the receipt and contract as well as date and time."

LW: Records provided show that on Dec 27, 2012 the Library Director signed a contract to reserve the 'pool room' at Mullen's Bar & Grill for 50 people. (how did she know 50 people planned to attend?) The reservation notes a "cash bar."  The reservation deposit amount of $820.00 was secured with a library credit card.  The final count for the party attendance was due on Jan 9, 2013.  

Two weeks before signing the contract, on Dec 13, 2012, the Library Director had emailed two employees involved in the planning of the "holiday staff party": 

Library Email to Staff: "We are confirmed for 1/12/2013 for our staff party at Mullen's. We get the room for 3 hours actually! It is reserved from 7:30-10:30... Love & Money is the band playing that evening and they should start about 10:00.... Cash bar for beverages."

LW was concerned when this following response was provided by the Lisle Library Director: 

Library: "E-mail - I extracted ones that still exist from my e-mail box that are relevant to the request."

"Still exist???"  

LW to Library:  

"Please explain the statement: "E-mail - I extracted ones that still exist..." This seems to imply records were deleted.... To be clear, the request was for copies of ".. records of ALL correspondence/email between and among staff regarding the "Employee Christmas Event." 

Presumably, the public body has data backup to disk and to tape for disaster recovery and archiving purposes in conformance to law that will facilitate the retrieval of all email, including any inadvertently deleted from a workstation.  Also, please provide a copy of the sign posted for this event - an event paid for with public funds."

Library Director:  "Subject to possible supplemental emails located by our IT Administrator (our IT Administrator is out of town), you have my emails responsive to your request."

On Oct 22, 2013 - nearly 2 weeks after the FOIA request was submitted - the following response from the Library (after the return of the IT administrator) raises more concerns about records management and destruction of public records: 

Library: "1.  Re: correspondence/email, we contacted Microsoft (Technical Support) for assistance and expect to have more information from Microsoft later today or tomorrow.  2. Re: a posted sign, we have no documents responsive to your request."

LW followed-up again and asked the Library Director if the "sign," a public record, was destroyed and inquired about tape and disk back-up of public records:

LW to Library:  "Are you saying you don't have a tape or disk back-up records management system for disaster recovery and archiving? Are you saying that you destroyed public records without a disposal certificate from the local records commission?"

Without answering the questions, the Library Director "found" and provided a copy of another one of her email's regarding the event: 

Nov 9, 2012 email from the Library Director to 56 of the library's 63 employees regarding the "holiday staff party":

Library Director:  "...The Library will contribute to nice appetizers and the staff will have access to a cash bar .... I need to know how many people might like to come, guests, and if costs get nutty, if you would be willing to kick in a few bucks."

At the February 20, 2013 Board of Trustees Meeting, the Library Director Shannon Halikias reports:

"The staff wishes to thank the Board for the first annual staff holiday party."

The "Board"? 

The Library Board did not pay for this "holiday staff party" - the Lisle Library taxpayers did.  


Questions: 

1. What is the public purpose of this expenditure of public funds for a "holiday staff party" on a Saturday night at a local bar & grill? Per the Illinois Constitution, public funds can only be used for a public purpose. What was the public purpose?

2. Why isn't there ANY documentation of the names of the persons who attended this event paid for with public funds?

3. Why is it so hard to locate and retrieve email in response to a FOIA? Is the library not in conformance with laws regarding e-discovery? 

4. Why would email  - public records - at a public body ever be deleted or destroyed? Why would email no longer "exist?" Is it reasonable to believe that none of the 63 library employees emailed each other regarding a "holiday staff party?" 

5. Why was the sign announcing the staff party destroyed without approval from the State?

6. Why is spending on a "holiday staff party" a priority over spending on proper records management systems or other government functions and responsibilities?

7. Should there be an investigation regarding destruction of public records?

8. What policies and procedures has the Board put into place regarding documentation and accountability for expenditures such as "holiday staff parties?" Should the Board revise their policies? What improvements need to be made?

9. Should the "First Annual Holiday Staff Party" also be the "Last Annual Holiday Staff Party" at the Lisle Library? How did the Lisle Library survive for 45 years from 1967 to 2012 without the expenditure of public funds for a "Holiday Staff Party"?

10. Should "social committees" and "social events" be funded by tax dollars or with voluntary employee donations? 

(originally posted Oct 25, 2013 on Lisle Patch)

Monday, November 18, 2013

Assessor Slashes 2013 Taxable Value of Lisle Hotels



The 2013 average assessed value of ALL property in Lisle Township was lowered by about 3.75% by the township assessor (before appeals). However, Lisle Watchdog has recently learned that the 2013 average assessed value (EAV) of Lisle's three  hotels on the corporate corridor - the Hilton, Hyatt, and Wyndham (now Sheridan)  - was slashed nearly 9.3%, in just one year.  

As will be shown in detail below, this year's drop in the assessed value of Lisle hotels primarily due to a significant drop in assessed value of the Lisle Hilton.


Specifically, the cut in assessed value breaks down as follows:

Lisle Hilton  Cut 17.47%
                2013 EAV  = $ 3,794,300    Fair Market Value = $ 11,382,900
                2012 EAV  = $ 4,597,440    Fair Market Value = $ 13,792,320

Lisle Hyatt  Cut 3.75%
                2013 EAV  = $ 3,528,810    Fair Market Value = $ 10,586,430
                2012 EAV  = $ 3,666,300    Fair Market Value = $ 10,998,900

Lisle Wyndham Cut 3.75%
                2013 EAV  = $ 2,999,300    Fair Market Value = $ 8,997,900
                2012 EAV  = $ 3,116,150    Fair Market Value = $ 9,348,450

TOTAL  (Hilton + Hyatt + Wyndham)
                2013 EAV  = $ 10,322,410  Fair Market Value = $ 30,967,230
                2012 EAV  = $ 11,322,890  Fair Market Value = $ 34,139,670

The 2013 total combined fair market value total of the three hotels is 33% less  - loss of $15,353,040 -  compared to the 2008 value. 


On average, the 2013 assessed value of single family residential properties is about 16% lower than in 2008.  

The net result is a shift in the property tax burden from commercial properties to residential properties. Even in years with a flat tax levy, home owners can expect to pay more as commercial property owners pay less.  

Numbers are still subject to change pending appeals before the DuPage County Board of Review. Final numbers are released in Spring 2014.

Sources: 


Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Lisle Library Tax Per Capita Among Highest in Chicago Region



Lisle Watchdog takes a look at how the local property tax per capita of the Lisle Library compares to other libraries in the Chicago region.

Data was obtained from the Illinois Secretary of State and State Librarian for the 2011 year.

Libraries in Chicago Metro Area communities with populations below 8,000 people were excluded from the comparative study.

Of 163 libraries, the Lisle Library ranks #18 (top 11%) in highest property tax per capita.


Library Name  Population  Property  Taxes

Tax per Capita

LA GRANGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 15550 3,676,433 236.4
GLENCOE PUBLIC LIBRARY 8723 1,912,316 219.2
WINNETKA-NORTHFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 17357 3,747,336 215.9
PROSPECT HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 14073 2,870,487 204.0
WILMETTE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 27087 5,284,264 195.1
LINCOLNWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 12590 2,432,466 193.2
ELK GROVE VILLAGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 22104 4,266,416 193.0
ELA AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 34462 6,189,313 179.6
LAKE FOREST LIBRARY 19375 3,335,229 172.1
NORTHBROOK PUBLIC LIBRARY 33170 5,641,504 170.1
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS MEMORIAL LIBRARY 75101 12,769,650 170.0
SKOKIE PUBLIC LIBRARY 64784 10,595,269 163.5
DEERFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY 18225 2,877,869 157.9
WOOD DALE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13166 2,060,132 156.5
EISENHOWER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 23184 3,617,357 156.0
VERNON AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 41055 6,401,571 155.9
ELMHURST PUBLIC LIBRARY 44121 6,727,404 152.5

LISLE LIBRARY DISTRICT 28504 4,241,916 148.8

MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
54167 8,035,845 148.4
MATTESON PUBLIC LIBRARY 19009 2,800,000 147.3
ITASCA COMMUNITY LIBRARY 8649 1,272,490 147.1
OAK PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 51878 7,608,404 146.7
HINSDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY 16816 2,388,850 142.1
GENEVA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 30505 4,326,045 141.8
BARRINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 44157 6,097,099 138.1
HIGHLAND PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 29763 4,080,195 137.1
FLOSSMOOR PUBLIC LIBRARY 9464 1,288,928 136.2
PALOS HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY 12515 1,703,299 136.1
FOUNTAINDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 67683 9,070,547 134.0
ALGONQUIN AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 40809 5,384,173 131.9
GLENVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY 44692 5,765,004 129.0
NILES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 57284 7,274,238 127.0
COOK MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 59842 7,528,328 125.8
ROLLING MEADOWS LIBRARY 24099 3,030,308 125.7
HOMEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 19323 2,398,449 124.1
BLOOMINGDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY 22018 2,655,042 120.6
WAUCONDA AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 27246 3,185,601 116.9
GLEN ELLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY 27450 3,200,726 116.6
FREMONT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 37499 4,325,224 115.3
LAGRANGE PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13579 1,537,761 113.2
BATAVIA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 26562 2,990,099 112.6
COAL CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 11257 1,255,809 111.6
HILLSIDE PUBLIC LIBRARY 8157 907,476 111.3
FOREST PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 14167 1,559,631 110.1
LAKE VILLA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 40276 4,356,854 108.2
ADDISON PUBLIC LIBRARY 36942 3,933,489 106.5
PARK RIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 37480 3,977,037 106.1
MOKENA COMMUNITY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 20539 2,173,928 105.8
MORTON GROVE PUBLIC LIBRARY 23270 2,457,382 105.6
OAK BROOK PUBLIC LIBRARY 7883 826,648 104.9
RIVERSIDE PUBLIC LIBRARY 8875 928,902 104.7
SCHAUMBURG TOWNSHIP DISTRICT LIBRARY 126849 13,231,742 104.3
GRAYSLAKE AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 28172 2,931,707 104.1
SAINT CHARLES PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 55092 5,712,460 103.7
DES PLAINES PUBLIC LIBRARY 58364 5,750,062 98.5
WOODRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 32971 3,176,396 96.3
CRYSTAL LAKE PUBLIC LIBRARY 40743 3,921,844 96.3
GLENWOOD-LYNWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 17976 1,693,167 94.2
BROOKFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY 18978 1,765,243 93.0
TOWN AND COUNTRY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 12392 1,133,345 91.5
NAPERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY 141853 12,897,369 90.9
CRETE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 18086 1,624,132 89.8
GAIL BORDEN PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 144597 12,973,863 89.7
FOX LAKE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 25284 2,267,364 89.7
BROADVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 7932 706,695 89.1
RIVER FOREST PUBLIC LIBRARY 11172 991,522 88.8
INDIAN TRAILS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 67010 5,935,301 88.6
CAROL STREAM PUBLIC LIBRARY 39711 3,452,544 86.9
TINLEY PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 56703 4,899,572 86.4
ANTIOCH PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 26111 2,249,337 86.1
OAK LAWN PUBLIC LIBRARY 56690 4,867,940 85.9
VILLA PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 21904 1,848,338 84.4
DOWNERS GROVE PUBLIC LIBRARY 47833 4,003,756 83.7
CHICAGO RIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY 14305 1,192,671 83.4
GLENSIDE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 36259 3,013,649 83.1
MESSENGER PUBLIC LIBRARY OF NORTH AURORA 16760 1,392,367 83.1
WARREN-NEWPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 66690 5,467,006 82.0
WARRENVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13551 1,090,466 80.5
PARK FOREST PUBLIC LIBRARY 21975 1,757,663 80.0
PLANO COMMUNITY LIBRARY DISTRICT 13107 1,001,840 76.4
NORTHLAKE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 26658 2,028,942 76.1
MAYWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 24090 1,815,021 75.3
GREEN HILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 31533 2,357,084 74.7
BRIDGEVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY 16446 1,226,394 74.6
THOMAS FORD MEMORIAL LIBRARY 12975 966,799 74.5
ELMWOOD PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 24883 1,838,604 73.9
ROSELLE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 22791 1,643,851 72.1
WINFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY 9080 652,122 71.8
WESTMONT PUBLIC LIBRARY 24685 1,766,270 71.6
POPLAR CREEK PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 66306 4,723,814 71.2
FRANKLIN PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 18333 1,302,902 71.1
HUNTLEY AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 39023 2,766,977 70.9
MCHENRY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 42023 2,970,994 70.7
LANSING PUBLIC LIBRARY 28331 1,993,423 70.4
INDIAN PRAIRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 42529 2,979,116 70.0
SOUTH HOLLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY 22030 1,510,490 68.6
WEST CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 29924 2,049,299 68.5
PALATINE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 88983 6,085,780 68.4
BARTLETT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 37555 2,558,233 68.1
HELEN M. PLUM MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 43160 2,928,212 67.8
BENSENVILLE COMMUNITY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 21409 1,393,937 65.1
MIDLOTHIAN PUBLIC LIBRARY 14819 950,679 64.2
LEMONT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 21685 1,390,245 64.1
FRANKFORT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 30484 1,948,328 63.9
STICKNEY-FOREST VIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 10412 656,934 63.1
CARY AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 28245 1,778,965 63.0
ORLAND PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 56767 3,542,186 62.4
WESTCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY 16718 1,041,130 62.3
ALSIP-MERRIONETTE PARK LIBRARY DISTRICT 22280 1,382,233 62.0
ROUND LAKE AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 40400 2,466,167 61.0
WORTH PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 10789 657,474 60.9
OSWEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 58871 3,477,155 59.1
WHEATON PUBLIC LIBRARY 52894 3,100,000 58.6
KANKAKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY 27537 1,590,421 57.8
RICHTON PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13646 783,279 57.4
MARKHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY 12508 644,800 51.6
SCHILLER PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 11793 607,651 51.5
AURORA PUBLIC LIBRARY 197899 10,194,727 51.5
BLUE ISLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY 23706 1,213,094 51.2
PRAIRIE TRAILS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 30031 1,524,271 50.8
EVANSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY 74486 3,774,353 50.7
LYONS PUBLIC LIBRARY 10729 541,570 50.5
MANHATTAN-ELWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13166 652,976 49.6
BELLWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY 19071 941,401 49.4
NIPPERSINK PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 11188 552,010 49.3
HOMER TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 39059 1,852,683 47.4
BRADLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13295 619,765 46.6
DES PLAINES VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 77893 3,538,829 45.4
FOSSIL RIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 14803 671,297 45.3
HARVEY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 25282 1,127,795 44.6
SUMMIT PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 11054 488,072 44.2
BERWYN PUBLIC LIBRARY 56657 2,497,312 44.1
SHOREWOOD-TROY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 19235 827,080 43.0
JOHNSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 12421 533,468 42.9
ZION-BENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 42403 1,799,502 42.4
DUNDEE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 69338 2,912,435 42.0
EVERGREEN PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 19852 829,542 41.8
NEW LENOX PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 36847 1,525,410 41.4
ELLA JOHNSON MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 16669 677,654 40.7
GRANDE PRAIRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 30641 1,239,056 40.4
THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 26600 1,072,750 40.3
YORKVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY 16921 680,750 40.2
WAUKEGAN PUBLIC LIBRARY 89078 3,559,204 40.0
RIVERDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13549 540,155 39.9
DOLTON PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 23153 919,954 39.7
MARENGO-UNION LIBRARY DISTRICT 13933 546,843 39.2
JOLIET PUBLIC LIBRARY 147433 5,639,492 38.3
WOODSTOCK PUBLIC LIBRARY 24770 944,252 38.1
MORRIS AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 18501 700,103 37.8
PLAINFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 75337 2,829,881 37.6
MELROSE PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 25411 947,437 37.3
RIVER GROVE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 10227 358,961 35.1
MANTENO PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 12432 416,564 33.5
SUGAR GROVE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 15761 505,501 32.1
BOURBONNAIS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 24242 698,282 28.8
PEOTONE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 16006 447,765 28.0
STEGER-SOUTH CHICAGO HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13709 350,517 25.6
NANCY L. MCCONATHY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 10497 266,105 25.4
ACORN PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 37332 933,056 25.0
JUSTICE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT 13707 275,468 20.1
CICERO PUBLIC LIBRARY 83891 1,528,259 18.2
NORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY 32574 590,700 18.1
CALUMET CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY 37042 655,081 17.7






Meet "Mr. Smith"



Mr. Smith" is an 81 yr old Lisle resident and taxpayer. He has lived here a long time. He knows a lot of people in town, so, he asked that his "real name" not be used in this story.




"Mr. Smith" is one of the senior citizens in Lisle who has seen a 28% increase in his property tax bill in the past 3 years. 

"Mr. Smith" qualified for, and received, a senior freeze exemption, a senior homestead exemption, and a homeowner's exemption on his property tax bill. 

"Mr. Smith," like many seniors, lives on a fixed income. In order to qualify for a senior freeze, he submits an affidavit every year that his household income is below the threshold. He derives his income mostly from social security and some interest on savings and investments. He does not collect a pension. 

"Mr. Smith" says that his social security payment went up less than 2% this past year for cost of living increase, (up about $500/yr) but the cost of his Medicare supplement insurance went up, as did the cost of water, the cost of gasoline, food and his property tax bill. His income from interest has dropped, too, over recent years since interest rates fell.   

"Mr. Smith" has cut back on other expenditures and if the housing market were better, he says he would consider selling his home.  

In 2010, "Mr. Smith" paid his 2009 property tax bill of $4,245. 
This year, he paid $5,425 in property taxes - 27.8% more.

Just this past year, "Mr. Smith" has seen a 9.1% increase in his property tax bill - from $4,975 to $5,425.  Property taxes alone more than ate up the small annual increase in his social security payment. He had been using his savings to pay for everyday costs that have increased. He worries about having enough money to live in his home for another 10-15 years.

Below you will find a summary of "Mr. Smith's" property tax increases from 2009 to 2012. 

Just reminder, the property tax is billed and due the year after the assessed year - the 2012 property tax was due in 2013. 


Tax Year 2012
$ 307,000 Fair Cash Value
$ 102,330 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   21,750 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     7.6868 Tax Rate
$   5,425 Tax Due    


Tax Year 2011

$ 326,400 Fair Cash Value
$ 108,800 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   28,220 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     7.0482 Tax Rate
$   4,975 Tax Due   


Tax Year 2010

$ 348,120 Fair Cash Value
$ 116,040 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   35,460 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     6.5662 Tax Rate
$   4,634  Tax Due  


Tax Year 2009

$ 366,410 Fair Cash Value
$ 122,140 Equalized Value
$     6,000 Residential Exemption
$     4,000 Senior Exemption
$   41,560 Senior Freeze Exemption
$   70,580 Net Taxable Value
     6.0138 Tax Rate
$   4,245  Tax Due  


When asked if he has contacted any local elected officials with his concerns about property taxes, "Mr. Smith" sighed and said that over the years he has come to learn that they simply don't care, don't listen and don't act. He said that he was very disturbed when an elected board laughed and belittled a long-time friend who expressed his concerns at a meeting about another issue a few years ago. 

"Society doesn't respect seniors these days, at least not in the way I was taught as a kid."  - Mr. Smith.  


Tax Rates:
  • 2012   7.6868
  • 2011   7.0482
  • 2010   6.5662
  • 2009   6.0138

Property assessments for 2013 will be lowered 3.75% across the board in Lisle Township. But since "Mr. Smith" is on senior freeze, he will see another hefty increase in property taxes unless all the taxing bodies reduce their tax levies to maintain a flat tax rate. 

(Note: Slight adjustments were made to the numbers to protect "Mr. Smith's" identity and privacy at his request. The information was obtained and verified by the DuPage County Treasurer's Office website tax database. LINK HERE
 - originally posted October 1, 2013 on Lisle Patch